Little Tim’s Christmas

Christmas is my favorite time of the year.  As the days shorten and the nights grow longer, we all need something to cope with the lack of light and the cold north winds.  Christmas is bright, warm and a time of year when friends and enemies put differences aside to revel in fantastically prepared victuals and sallies of wit beside a warm fire.  One tradition in our family is to often re-read or even recite the following poem, which was found by my grandmother over 80 years ago.  It is not a bright and cheery tale, but a step back  from the trappings of our commercialized holiday cheer.  It is a story centered around a small shoe shine boy trying to survive the winter in a city at the end of the Nineteenth Century.  My family now shares this tradition with you by presenting, Little Tim’s Christmas . . .

“I really don’t know what Christmas is,” said Little Tim with a sigh                                            As he stood on the corner, pale and cold, and watched the crowd go by.                       “Maybe it’s something nice and warm, or good to eat.” said he.                                          “They all seem to be carrying bundles home, most all of them but me.”

“I wish I had an overcoat, but anything isn’t mine,                                                                         I don’t believe there’s a Santa Claus, say Mister, have a shine?                                                   It really doesn’t cost much at all, as you already know,                                                               And it’s sure to be a lift to me, if only a cent or so.”

But the stranger hurried himself along with nothing cheerful to say.                                      He thought of his home, his family, and a gladsome Christmas day!                                       “There’s none of them want a shine tonight and nobody seems to see                                   How cold it is on the street tonight for a poor, little chap like me.”

But Tim never met with a comforting glance, nor even a pitying eye,                                       As he thought of a home he heard about somewhere up in the sky.                                             He saw a church with its open doors; the light and the warmth were there,                            so he thought he would follow the people in, if nobody seemed to care.

He crept in softly and through the aisle, he wandered with noiseless feet,                             And then he sat down at the farther end of a softly cushioned seat.                                          In the church, a bright and happy throng sang hymns and praises of joy,                             But no one noticed the shrinking form of the ragged and shivering boy.

They sang of peace, they sang of joy, and charity was their theme,                                         But of all the want there is in the world, they did not even dream.                                           The hymns were ended a moment more and when all was quiet and still,                               The preacher said, “I will speak tonight of charity’s sweet goodwill.”

“Go out into the byways and feed the poor, ’tis a blessed Christmas then,                                It is thus we show our brotherly love” and the people said “Amen!”                                           Then out of the church they went once more, to homes of love and light.                              They spoke no more of the poor, but said, “What a lovely sermon tonight!”

The sextant, after all were gone and the lights were low and dim,                                             In the vestibule saw a blackening box and the form of little Tim.                                            “Come boy, go out into the street!  This is not the place for you!” he said.                             But when there came no answer, the sextant saw that the little boy was dead.

O’ Friends be careful, there is so much more to do.                                                                         Be sure there is no one needy here, close by in a neighboring pew!                                        And when you go to your homes tonight, loved ones fondly to greet,                                   Remember that many a poor one lives on many another street.

There may be a form that is cold and others filled with dread,                                                   Or ragged souls that are begging, and small children crying for bread.                                 Too often they perish because the flame of charity burns too dim.                                              For many there are in this world of ours, alone like little Tim.

From Samanthastephens.com,

MERRY CHRISTMAS, EVERYONE !!

Posted in Real life | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Little Tim’s Christmas

Lunar Tick!

John Fitzgerald Kennedy said, “Why the moon . . . ?” Yes, why the moon?  What is our fascination with our neighboring orbital satellite?  Some reasons are obvious.  As a nighttime astrological feature, it’s the biggest and brightest.  It pulls on our planet making high tides higher and low tides lower.  When Kennedy presented his famous “moon speech,”  he said we choose to go to the moon not because it was easy, but because it was hard.  Actually, due to its proximity, the moon was the easiest target, but in the 1960’s the moon seemed unreachable.

Imagine a world where over half of the citizens in the United States thought we’d never land on the moon.  So while there are a few obvious physical reasons to be fascinated by this big rock, why is the moon so romanticized and adored?  Is it the mysterious visions of imagination we credit the moon or is it the purported mayhem afforded it when its phase is “full.”  The fantasies conjured by the moon are as varied as the human mind can produce.  This soaring, meteor-scarred piece of rock and dust is the subject of many tales of science-fiction, romance, drama, and horror.  Whether the stories affect our behavior or vice versa, the moon affects each and every one of us in a different way.

A full moon is the first thing that grabs our attention, as a cold, starry night lit by a bright disc against a pitch black background is a fantastic scene that never ages.  Snow on the ground adds a soft brilliance that rivals a sunny day.  This soft, soothing glow is, no doubt, the main reason for all the romance surrounding the moon and such terms as moonlight, moonbeams, and moon glow.

A full moon is also responsible for a dark and mysterious culture.  Besides the physical reality that is the so-called “dark” side of the moon, certain folklore and supernatural tales evolved from, or are linked, to the moon.  Indeed, the word “lunatic” derived from the moon.  Although science cannot connect the existence of the moon to crazy acts, lunacy, romance, or any other part of human behavior, leave it to humans themselves to effect an end result.  Here are a few of my favorites:

Sleep, or lack thereof –    Many folks on this planet do not sleep well when there is a full moon.  For the most part, a night as bright as a hazy day may be the culprit.  Moonbeams through a bedroom window can be a distraction, one that most people solve by drawing the curtains.  Others insist sleeplessness is connected to the occult.  “It must be a full moon, I didn’t get a wink of sleep last night!” is a common complaint.  Some members of my family suffer from this affliction.

Witches–  Witches love to soar across a full moon, or so I’m told.  I know several witches, but never saw them take flight, let alone fly across the moon.  In fact, I never saw any witches fly across the moon, but then again, I may not stand in the right spots during a full moon.

Werewolves–  An absolute favorite for fantasy lovers and other crazies.  What’s better than being a regular guy or gal, and then getting all hairy and violent during a full moon?  And the teeth and claws are such a bonus!  I’m sure most folks who know they’re werewolves don’t schedule hair appointments during a full moon.  Things like that can run into big bucks, unless you really don’t mind a light trim around the legs.

Vampires–  If you’re thinking that a full moon is not connected to vampire legend, you’re exactly right, but it does affect screenwriters.  Newly-twisted vampire lore is trying to connect the moon to vampires, particularly the CW network production of The Vampire Diaries. Now with the new Hybrid Curse and the moonstone, Kevin Williamson and Julie Plec are destroying the old guard of Beli Lugosi followers with their teenybopper fans.  Vampires already toss and turn in the night, so they sleep by day.  Remember everyone-  werewolves metamorphose during a full moon, are warded off by wolfbane, and killed by silver bullets (no, not Coors Light or dildos); vampires bite people to make more vampires, are warded off by garlic, and killed by sunlight or a wooden stake driven through the heart–  period!

As for me, I think a full moon is beautiful!  I gaze at it just for the majesty of it.  I sleep like a baby during a full moon because I know it’s moving away from the earth at a rate of one inch per year and I take comfort in knowing that it’s one of the few celestial objects that’s not going to bang into the earth soon.  As for worrying about vampires, werewolves, and witches, well, I’m sure you’ll agree it’s a bunch of nonsense.  Besides, I know some friends that will take good care of me . . . and some of them are Vulcans.

Posted in Fantasy Fun, Real life, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Lunar Tick!

Mortal Kombat!

No one likes cleaning the house.  Most people feel some type of satisfaction after the job is done, which seems to make the distasteful task worth it all.  Not my wife, though.  She hates housework and cooking, but she does love doing laundry and hauling wood to the fireplace.  Since I love to cook, which is fortunate, because I love to eat, the fact she doesn’t cook works out well; my clothes are clean and the fireplace warm.  But do not, repeat, do not mention two words to my wife– vacuuming and housework!  If you do, you’ll be met with a little piece of Ireland you didn’t know existed.  Eventually, she looks about the house and exclaims, “This place is filthy!” and with a huff and a grumble, pulls out the dust rags and the vacuum cleaner, and attacks the mighty chore.  After the place is all shine, I usually ask, “Now wasn’t that worth it?”  I’m always met with a resounding, “No!!”

The fact that getting my wife to clean is as much a life event as a wedding or a funeral doesn’t bother me that much, because I’m not adverse to grabbing a toilet brush or dust rag, so if I’m not satisfied with the look of a particular room, it’s just as much my duty to start cleaning as it is hers.  There are advantages to NOT cleaning the house, according to my wife, and the bounty of excuses never ends.

Number one on my list of favorites is the yearly excuse for the entire month of October.  Hallowe’en’s coming and the house is already decorated, complete with dust, cob webs and real live spiders.  I must admit, not buying rubber spiders is a plus and it’s a bonus that the little critters are self-storing.  Eat your heart out, Morticia Addams!

Another gem, though sometimes embarrassing, is internet labeling.  As guests are entangled or ducking the spider webs, my wife exclaims, “Welcome to my web site!”  Most guests still stick around, even if it’s to avoid getting tangled in webs on their way out.  Besides the strange looks we get, there are a few strained smiles.  Eat your heart out, Vincent Price!

“It’s good for the carpet!” is another dandy!  This I call the “auto detailing” excuse.  My wife figures that if rubbing compound removes scratches from auto paint, the abrasives left on the floor will somehow shine the carpet.  Sand, coal dust or ashes, you just can’t get enough of them.  Eat your heart out, Stanley Steemer!

When verbal excuses fail, my wife takes action using a tactic I call the “Piss in the gas tank” excuse.  Sabotaging the equipment isn’t easy, but it’s extremely effective.  The victim is the vacuum cleaner, a machine hated equally by her and the cat.  Much like a demolition derby driver, my wife casually smashes the poor thing into walls, cabinets and furniture hoping some essential part of the vacuum will fly off into space saving her from continuing the onerous task.  If that doesn’t work, sucking up a throw rug or carpet fringe is a sure vacuum stopper.

I do protest when the vacuum cleaner is bashed to pieces this way, but my protests fall on deaf ears, as my wife quotes General George S. Patton’s answer to French villagers who implored the General not to crash his tanks through their homes, “This vacuum has no reverse!”

Posted in Real life | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Mortal Kombat!

Sugar . . . Oh, Honey, Honey!

No other subject in college annoyed me more than organic chemistry.  As a biology and geology student, organic chem was a necessary evil and while I enjoyed certain aspects of the subject, like the labs, nucleic acids and such, most of organic chemistry was alphabet soup.  I’d trade double doses of any subject, inorganic chemistry, physics, German, or religion, to skip the whole organic thing.  But . . . there was one aspect of organic chemistry I loved and was good at . . . sugar chemistry!  I loved those little sugar molecules as much as dogs like rolling in . . . well, you get the idea.  I could just throw myself into a big pile of those wonderful carbohydrates, academically speaking, be it glucose, fructose, maltose, lactose, or galactose.  Love them all!  And the best part?  Chemistry majors hate sugar chemistry!  Too much memorization, they complain.  Aw, poor little brain dead chemistry majors!

Another aspect I enjoyed about organic chemistry was the lectures.  Not that I’m crazy about sitting in a lecture hall, but the instructor for this class was entertaining as hell and a hell of a nice guy, too.  His name was Dr. Ned Heindel, who stood at the bottom of a steeply-tiered lecture room in Chandler Lab, puffing his cigar and scribbling madly on a set of black boards that stretched across the front of the room.  He entered the lecture hall one morning and announced he would teach one of my favorites–  sugar isomers and stereoisomerism!  Now, if you’re chemically challenged, you may ask, “What the hell is an isomer?”  Simply put, it’s chemical compounds whose molecular formula is the same, but their structural formula, or arrangement, is different.  You might say one of your pants pockets contains the same number and denomination of bills as the other, but you’re spending it on different things.  Stereoisomers, on the other hand, are compounds with the same molecular formula, the same structural formula, but are oriented, or turned, a little differently in three-dimensional space.  Without throwing in the definition of enantiomers, dextrorotatory sucrose, levorotatory sucrose, and the gauche effect, suffice it to say that sugar molecules suffer from a form of stereoisomerism that, in layman’s terms, means they are mirror images of each other. Behold the tasty little glucose molecules below:

It’s like looking into a mirror, that is if you’re a sugar molecule.  A good macro-demonstration is to place both hands, yes, your hands, palms down on a table or desk in front of you.  Although your hands are essentially the same, they’re now backwards of each other or mirror images of each other.  That’s stereoisomerism in a nut shell!

This fateful morning in the lecture hall, someone else was way ahead of poor, unsuspecting Dr. Heindel.  This mystery person knew the morning’s topic, knew stereoisomerism, and wasn’t afraid to use it.  The trap was wisely concealed behind a series of vertical sliding chalkboards that were in the center of the front wall.  As the naive  professor lectured and scribbled on the blackboard, he heaved each 3′ x 4′ slate upward in a cloud of chalk dust revealing a clean fresh slate beneath.  He exhausted a second slate with chalk-scrawled carbon chains and handsome enantiomers, then stuck his cigar back into his mouth and grabbed the handle at the bottom of the blackboard.  He heaved it upward to expose the third slate.

WARNING:  The following is rated PG-13.  Parental discretion is advised! Click on the chemistry blackboard on the right to see what Dr. Heindel, and his class, witnessed that fateful morning in the lecture hall . . .

Posted in Real life, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sugar . . . Oh, Honey, Honey!

What’s in a name?

Remember George Carlin’s Seven Words You Can’t Say on Television?  One of those infamous words was “tits,” and George thought it didn’t even belong on the list.  “Sounds like a nickname!” he said, “Hey, Tits, com’ere! Tits, Toots!  Toots, Tits!”  As you can see, nicknames can be a fun thing.  Nicknames are short, simple, easy to remember, and most importantly, they should be fun.  Many nicknames evolve among friends and are based on physical attributes, behavior, or other personality traits, like freckles, gimpy, hawk eye, and cool breeze. Others are a result of a cute replacement for a formal name among people who are very fond of each other, like darling, sweetheart, and honey. Nicknames can be cruel, such as fatty, four-eyes, dumbo, and stinky.  But all personal nicknames, whether helpful or hurtful, funny or cruel, are usually based in fact.

Not so for schools and sports teams, however, where a plethora of ill-fitting monikers abound.  This is particularly true for high schools, where the audience input for deciding on a nickname is, shall we say, limited.  High schools are plagued with adult interference; high school nicknames and their associated mascots are a blend of stupid politically correct academic labels and long-gone failed industries.  One prime example is the high school my daughter attended whose nickname is “Konkrete Kids.” Misspelling aside, the adults in the community constantly moon over the glory days of the concrete industry of the past and even plagued the school with a museum within the school building itself.  Young “Konkrete Kids” are forced to parade by this smoke-stack display, a constant reminder of their town’s failed attempt to keep it the “cement” center of the universe.  While the Konkrete reference may bode well for the football or wrestling teams, the swim team was never too enamored with the idea and simply used “Kids,”which in a twist of coaching genius, was printed on the swim caps.  A newly-hired principal showed some moxy, or so we thought, when she proposed changing this beastly name, but in typical adult fashion, her solution was much worse than the original.  She unveiled that the nickname should be “Konkrete Foundations” as a demonstration that this school provides its students with an excellent academic foundation.  A good start to academic excellence? How about spelling concrete correctly!

I, too, was saddled with an unusual high school nickname, Thunderbolts, which seemed innocuous until one understands that it’s not referring to an atmospheric disturbance.  Thunderbolt was the name given the World War II fighter plane designated P-47.  Were they built in this city?  No!  The only connection?  The plane was used to train 1500 pilots in gunnery practice during World War II.  The Thunderbolt, nicknamed the Jug, was the heaviest single engine propeller-driven fighter in history, and although it was almost as sluggish as a B-17 bomber, the Jug’s saving grace was it durability.  Since it was a veritable flying brick, neither the Germans nor the Japanese could knock the thing out of the sky.  When I was in high school, I never knew Thunderbolt was a plane, and during my tenure, I don’t think our football team would ever perform was well as it did if we knew our real nickname was “Jugs.”  Although the adult population never erected a museum in the school for the P-47, they did correct the misconception that the nickname was a powerful lightning strike by painting a mural of the plane on the equipment shed out front.  The football team was never the same after that.

Finally, the worst high school nickname, with which I was personally involved, was our high school rivals in the adjacent town–  the Poultry Clan.  While roaming this school’s halls looking for a bathroom in 1969, I ventured upon a billboard with a cardboard cutout of a giant rooster with the words, “Mr. Rooster says, we may be chickens, but we’re not featherweights!”  Good God, y’all!  Now there’s a mighty slogan that’ll make you march into Hell for a Heavenly cause!  Of course, this area was well-known for its egg production in the past, and since all the adults are living in the past, well, Poultry Clan seemed appropriate to them.  It is my understanding that the school shed its chicken image lately and changed the nickname to a more “politically correct” The Fighting Clan. I’m not sure why it’s the “fighting” clan.  Perhaps because Ku and Klux were already taken.

Posted in It's part of the language!, Real life | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What’s in a name?

Good Beginnings

“Call me Ishmael . . .”  Herman Melville, Moby Dick.

“These are the times that try men’s souls.”  Thomas Paine, Common Sense.

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times . . .”  Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities.

In that time of year when thou may’st in me behold, when yellow leaves, or none, or few do hang . . .”  William Shakespeare,  Seventy-third sonnet.

“Once upon a midnight dreary, as I pondered weak and weary. . .”  Edgar Allan Poe, The Raven.

All good literature– novels, short stories, epic poems — all begin with a line or phrase that burns a message through the retina and into the brain which says “read on!”  It is called the “hook” and it’s a very powerful tool in the literary world.  After the hook, pressure on the author mounts, as he or she struggles to keep the reader’s interest one sentence, one paragraph, one page, and one chapter at a time.  Good writers get this and as they weave their tales of mystery, love, adventure or deceit, the reader hardly notices that the trap is set and sprung.

When I first read Moby Dick, I was naive enough to believe that Melville sat in the corner of a dark room at a large wooden desk, shadows of a whale oil flame flickering against his bearded face, and instantly wrote “Call me Ishmael. . .”  After all, he was considered a great author, and Moby Dick was a great book and a classic, right?  Surely, it was easy for him to write this or any story he chose.  But the book was not received well by English critics in 1851, and Melville’s tale about a whale almost spiraled him into literary obscurity.  In college, an English professor gave us a list of several works of literature and asked each member of the class to re-write the first sentence.  I chose Thomas Paine’s pamphlet Common Sense.  This seemed all too easy an assignment, but I was sadly mistaken.  Confident, I  sat at my desk and wrote down Paine’s words,

“These are the times that try men’s souls.”  Then I wrote,

“These are trying times for men’s souls.”  Naw, that won’t work, I thought!

“Trying times are these for men’s souls.”  Well, that sucks.

“Men’s souls are tried by times like these.”  Forget it!  It won’t work!  I’m not Thomas Paine!  This is really hard!

Then it dawned on me!  Thomas Paine didn’t sit down one afternoon and simply pen this sentence.  Perhaps, he wrote the entire pamphlet before he sat down and pondered this beginning.   What was Thomas Paine thinking?  I believe I know now.  I picture him with his head in his hands thinking how he could get such an important message across to his fellow colonists in a nation about to go to war.  A message so important and so powerful, the first words must capture the colonists’ attention and prevent them from putting the pamphlet down.  Whether it was an hour, many hours, a night, two nights or more, Paine probably wrote and re-wrote many passages to his now famed Common Sense, including the very first words until he knew . . . knew his message would ring out across the American colonies.  The same was true for Melville . . . or Dickens . . . or Poe . . . or any writer, great or small. How deceptively brilliant to introduce a main character in a novel by simply penning, “Call me Ishmael!”

People’s lives are much like great works of literature.  Some, like a great novel, start well and as their lives move on, they write chapter after chapter like a well-built classic tale.  Others are tragedies that are pure horror and often end  far too soon.  Some lives are a series of novels, short stories or epic poems.  New tales are forged from births, deaths, marriages and new friendships.  Whatever your story or collection of stories that is your life, remember to think ahead and craft the tale your way.  If you’re fortunate to start with a great “hook” or opening sentence, don’t waste it.  Build on it.  If you’re beginning was rough, start another tale.  Take control of your story.   It’s never too late for a good beginning!

Posted in It's part of the language!, Real life | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Good Beginnings

Topsy Turvy World

Why is Australia the land “down under?”  Who determined the North Pole is the top of the world instead of the bottom?  Personally, I blame the Greek astronomer Claudius Ptolemaeus who arbitrarily placed North at the top of maps about a hundred years after the death of Christ.  Cartographers followed in Ptolemy’s footsteps ever since with the north bias of their maps.

The earth is already upside down, magnetically speaking.  The North Pole attracts the north point of the needle of any magnetic compass.  To do this, the needle’s south pole is attracted to the  earth’s north pole, so in reality, the needle is actually pointing south.  Now, since the north and south poles of a magnet are arbitrary names to distinguish one from another (they could be called “end 1” and “end 2” to accomplish the same effect), we can still blame Ptolemy for this mess.  No one in his right mind calls the north end of a magnet the top.  It just attracts the south pole of another magnet and repels the north end.  Physicists don’t get all territorial about whose on the top or whose on the bottom.

Some folks fight the north bias by investing in a reverse map, also known as an Upside Down Map or South Up Map showing the continent of Antarctica as the top of the world and Australia as the land “up over.”  Now this may not seem to be a very big issue, but how would Americans feel if the reverse mappers revolted in a cartographic coup’d etat of the world’s chart makers and the U.S. became the land “down under?”  Would make a country feel a little less like a superpower don’t you think?

The psychological effect of either living North or South was recently demonstrated by four scientists,  Meier, Moller, Chen, and Riemer-Peltz, when they studied participants’ reactions to the question, “Where would you rather live?”  In first study, participants were handed a map of an imaginary city with a north point at the top of the map.  Most chose properties above the center line, or northern part of the city.  The second study involved an imaginary city with the south point at the top of the map.  Again, participants chose properties in the upper part of the map, demonstrating that people believe it is better or more prestigious to live at or near the top of the map regardless of whether it is north or south.

Imagine how the history of the U.S. Civil war would read if we all used a reverse map. The north becomes the loser, the south a winner.  No wonder those poor Confederates are still angry.  Can you blame them, being stuck in the South and all?  Well now they know who to blame . . . not the Yankees, but Ptolemy!  And if you don’t believe me the earth should be upside down, take a look at the original orientation of the famous “Blue Marble” photo taken from Apollo 17.  Antarctica and Australia are on top!

Posted in It's part of the language!, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Topsy Turvy World

Us Tareyton Smokers Go Further!

Detective Arthur P. Dietrich is interviewing a man arrested for spray painting an “f” on the side of a city bus to correct the poor English in an ad that read, “Filet-O-Fish.”  Dietrich appears sympathetic to the man’s rants about the deterioration of the English language in speech and writing.  The detective stops typing the police report occasionally, nodding and agreeing with the man as he goes on and on.  The man admits his wrongdoing, but believes any punishment should be minimized since his act was a righteous crime committed to correct atrocities against humanity.

“Fillet-O-Fish!” the man cries out, “Can you believe it?”

Dietrich shakes his head slowly and says dryly, “No, your’re right.  It’s terrible!”

“Then you agree with me, Lieutenant?”

“Certainly!  Now can we get back to this report?  Let’s see . . . I got your name, address, ah, here we go . . . Next-O-Kin?”

Of course, Detective Dietrich is the fictional investigator in the squad room of the American television sitcom, Barney Miller.  The dry, calm, all-knowing gumshoe was portrayed brilliantly by actor Steve Landesberg, who admitted in a Washington Post interview that he was nothing like the omnipresent character.

Although the audience viewed Dietrich’s captured graffiti artist as a crazed loon, the story writers’ message was clear– advertisers will do anything to get a message across to the public, even if they butcher the language to do it. When cigarette ads reigned supreme on the small tube, The American Tobacco Company seemed to delight in English faux pas propaganda as they eschewed such gems as “Winston tastes good like a cigarette should!” and “Us Tareyton smoker’s would rather fight than switch!” We consumers would rather our ads be written correctly as an advertisement should!  But, it was the 1960’s and any company that sold products to poison loyal customers could write any kind of ad.  If you’re killing folks with your merchandise, what’s a few grammatical errors among friends?

The latest blunder on the advertising scene is concocted by the Ford Motor Company.  Elena Ford, Ford’s global director of marketing and the great-great granddaughter of founder Henry Ford is quoted, “We go further so you can!”  Thus the great slogan “GO FURTHER!” was born.  Can anyone at Ford count his balls and come up with the same number twice?  If you’re selling cars, you must assume that a car slogan is not written to describe the metaphysical distance that is “further,” but would refer to an automobile that lasts longer, gets great gas mileage and, thus, goes “farther.”  I’m sure General Motors agrees that a Ford will not go “farther” or “further” than their autos!

Perhaps we can’t blame Ford, the American Tobacco Company and its advertising agencies for all these mistakes when smarter people than they screwed up the language hundreds of years ago.  Case in point, in a letter to Dr. Robert Hooke, Sir Isaac Newton wrote, “If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.”  I guess the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree!

Physics, A+ ; English, F

Posted in Celebrity and Fame, It's part of the language!, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Us Tareyton Smokers Go Further!

Should I Vote?

Picture the American voter.  Like a baby bird in the nest, turning its outstretched, open beak skyward for its next meal.  Chirping, singing and squalling for more and more and more.  Next time you’re driving, snarled in traffic or stopped at a light, look left and right —  yes, that’s the face of the real American voter.  Take a good look, because it’s these people, not the Continue reading

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Should I Vote?

Who will win? Obama or Romney?

With the first Presidential debate history and the GOP’s darling Mitt on a roll, it’s time to turn my attention to a little politics.  This race is unique as the players (Mitt and Barack and their families) are pretty “even” in the Madison Avenue department– both sides are a handsome group that look worthy of the Presidential palace that is the White House.  Usually, the “good-looking” factor is easily decided as candidates can only minimally change their appearance.  During the Kennedy-Nixon contest, Continue reading

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Who will win? Obama or Romney?